• Bluemound Asset Management
    Bluemound Asset Management A Kirk Spano company

A Better Way…

Kirk SpanoAccording to Warren Buffett, the top 2 investing rules are…

Rule No. 1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget rule No. 1.  

The most important aspect of financial planning is having an investment approach that protects you from large permanent losses and still gives you an opportunity to make money over the long-term.  I founded Bluemound Asset Management after seeing that most of the sales driven financial industry comes up lacking.

My name is Kirk Spano. I am visible and easy to follow in the media. Please take some time to read about the advice I have given. Then, if you are ready to find a better way to secure your lifestyle and create a legacy, contact me so that we can talk about what is important to you.

MarketWatch  Fox Business  WisBusiness.com  Seeking Alpha      Scutify

A Recession By Any Other Name

October 2009  

A Recession By Any Other Name

Awhile back I mentioned that the talking heads did not want to acknowledge a recession, much less a depression, in the United States.  The level of denial about the economic dire straits in the United States struck home with me when I read one vehement poster on a website that I peruse absolutely deny that the United States was in a recession, much less a depression.  I was so shocked that I asked him the following, “about 20% of the people in the country are unemployed or underemployed, do you think they are depressed?”

What is a Recession

There is so much misinformation in the financial media, I thought I would review what a recession actually is.  Let’s start with what it is not:

  • A recession is not back to back quarters of negative GDP (gross domestic product).  That definition is a shortcut people whose job it is to report and explain the economy use so that they do not have to report and explain what is really happening in the economy.  No self-respecting economist (if there is such a beast) would use that definition. 

Here’s what the National Bureau of Economic Statistics says: “The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP. Rather, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales.” 

The NBER’s definition is important because they are the ones who identify and catagorize economic expansions and contractions.  It’s their job to figure out what a recession is and when it is occuring.

Taking from their guidelines we can surmise about where we are at today:

Real GDP (Gross Domestic Production): It looks set to rise for the most recent quarter by about 3% or so.  Unfortunately, adjusted for money supply growth (i.e. inflation), about a 3% growth in gross domestic production is in real terms no growth at all.

Real Income: According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis real incomes have been falling at about 1% per month for awhile.  Consider that only accounts for the employed.

Employment: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics unemployment is rising by hundreds of thousands per month for well over a year.  Currently, we have about 15 million people unemployed according to the government.  I can only presume they are not counting all fifty states.  Take a look at this from Shadow Government Statistics:

 

Industrial Production: Here we have a slight glimmer of sunshine as industrial production turned very slightly positive the past few months.  This jives with my previous letters that the recovery will be business led, not consumer led.  The obvious problem is that this modest growth had much to do with filling inventory levels which had been allowed to deplete and as a result of various government inspired stimulus, i.e. cash for clunkers.

Wholesale-Retail Sales: Mediocre news here from the U.S. Census Bureau as these numbers were only very slightly up despite the cash for clunkers and other stimulus.

What does it all mean? 

The bright spots are the industrial production numbers as it looks like businesses have retrenched.  It appears business is about done contracting which means that substantial shrinkage in the economy may be about done.  This does not mean that real growth is ready to resume yet however.

Unemployment remains very high and is still climbing.  Although it looks like unemployment is beginning to level off, with levels this high, it is clear that consumer driven growth is out of the question in the short and probably medium run.  Real household take home pay is also significantly lower than a decade ago which stifles household spending.  In the simplest terms, without good paying jobs, Americans will not be able to spend as previously accustomed to.  Put on top of that, high household debts, a result of many never planning for a rainy day, and the consumer spending malaise will last a long time.

Rutgers recently made the point that, “Even if the nation could add 2.15 million private-sector jobs per year starting in January 2010, it would need to maintain this pace for more than 7 straight years (7.63 years), or until August 2017, to eliminate the jobs deficit! This is approximately 50 percent greater than the length of the average post-World War II expansion (58 months).”

What Rutgers, and others, are saying, is that a recovery to a fully functioning economy could take the better part of a decade.  I agree that is clearly a possibility, if not a probablity. 

Turning Green Into Green To Spur the Economy 

So, the reality of a business led recovery, as opposed to a consumer driven recovery is becoming much more clear to everybody.  A business led recovery will be slow, as businesses are not going to over-extend financially to ramp up production prematurely.  Even if businesses wanted to be more aggressive, it is clear that banks are not ready to accomodate.  Thus, businesses will move slowly, a step at a time, as global demand creates new business.  The American “spend and grow” economy is likely not only in a coma, it might just be dead and unlikely to be reborn for maybe a decade.  We will recover as the world recovers and our companies gain a share of that business.  It is incumbant that government help create conditions for that to happen.

So, what can we do to fix this? 

It is important that government overcome politics and achieve several items in short order:

  1. Help create the conditions for business to thrive with rationale tax and incentive policies.
  2. Regulate healthcare delivery in a way that makes delivery more efficient, not more expensive.
  3. Make sure that households are able to keep more of their income against a looming inflation, so that such necessities as food and energy are available to all.  Allowing shortages would generate massive social unrest and disrupt the system immensly.
  4. Take on policies that promote job creation for productive industries, not paper pushing service industries.  Specifically, we must embark on a massive rebuild of the energy, transportation and water infrastructures to use greener approaches. 
  5. Limit tax increases to those very wealthy (top 2%) who do not create or support business development which creates American jobs.   

I am cautiously optimistic that government can do what is needed.  We will see if they do.  The problem, as always, is the partisan acrimony, special interests and lack of economic intelligence on the part of some in government (clearly in both parties, not one or the other).

Ultimately, as touched on in number four above, the only thing I see that can really jumpstart the economy in a bigger faster way is a massive rebuild of the energy, water and trasportation infrastructures using greener technology.  We need to commit to wind and solar power, at least some new bigger nuclear power plants to replace the aging ones (we need a clean reliable backbone of a power system that does not fade when the sun goes down or the wind is not blowing), a new and improved smart electric grid, electric cars, natural gas powered buses and trucks, new roads and bridges, sewage and groundwater recharge facilities… etc… That rebuild would create long term employment with good wages that would be pumped repeatedly through the economy over time.  Notably, a massive move to renewability would also be safer from a national security standpoint versus importing more energy resources, less expensive long run than stripping our natural resources (as we have been moving towards) and clearly better than polluting the environment more than we already have.

If we do not make those commitments, there is no economic wave that will turn the economy around anytime soon in my opinion.  The wave everybody wants to talk about, international growth, is coming, but that consumer class is a generation away and many nations can only grow so fast due to financial and labor constraints.  Bottom line, I do not care what the talking heads say, we are still in a recession, and without some very forward thinking approaches, it could very well turn into a depression or more likely a multi-dip recession lasting the better part of a decade.  It is incumbant on all of us to push our politicians in the correct directions– which are generally not reserved to the right and left directions. 

And Yet, Opportunity 

While I again sound dire, hardly the over bullish industry standard, I repeat, there are always investment opportunities for those with assets in 401k plans, IRAs and other accounts.  It is important to be very careful in selecting the investments which fill your accounts however.  Defending your investment account balances is more important than chasing a short term investment return, always.  Remember what you have heard Hall of Fame coaches say for years, “defense wins championships.”  From playing good defense, we will continue to have money available to invest in opportunities as they occur. 

Generational opportunities are near at hand.  As I said at our investor breakfast a few days ago, I expect market turbulance for years.  That turbulance will be among the best investment opportunities in decades.  Get ready to buy those opportunities the same way that smart investors did in the 1970s.  People who invested in the 1970s did very well in the 1980s and 1990s.

Thoughtfully, cautiously, hopefully and cordially,

Kirk Spano

Share this page

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google BookmarksSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

Find Worthy Causes

Evaluate charities here.

Bluemound will match any donations that clients make to qualifying charities and causes up to 10% of the fees that we bill to a client.

Investment Programs

All of our investment programs provide a level of service and expertise rarely found within the retail financial industry. Our programs also are at the low-end of the fee scale relative to the financial industry. All of our investment management and consulting services have access to our founder and nationally recognized advisor Kirk Spano.

 Punch Card Stocks

Based on Warren Buffett’s idea that if there was a limit to how many companies we invest in, that our investments would be less risky and perform better. Read more…

Retirement Income Options

A flexible income strategy designed to handle any interest rate environment and provide enough growth for a long life.  Read more…

Resource Opportunity

Scarcity for resources and looming inflation require that any portfolio have exposure to hard assets and companies that provide resources for our lives. Read more…

Investment Coaching

A flat-fee program for self-directed investors who would like a well regarded professional to consult with and learn from. Limited space.  Read more…

Tactical ETF Allocator

A unique diversified low cost exchange traded fund (ETF) strategy for dealing with an uncertain global economy. Read more…

Mutual Fund Selector

A low cost flat-fee program for traditional investors who want a better way to manage a mutual fund portfolio without new commissions.  Read more…

401(k) Monitor

Fund selection, contribution strategy and ongoing asset allocation recommendations for your at-work retirement plan.  Read more…

Annuity Rescue

A chance to reduce annuity expenses, increase net returns and avoid the nasty surprise awaiting most annuity owners.  Read our free report.

Kirk’s Recent Quarterly Letters

Dealing With Today’s Volatility

“I don’t really care about volatility.” Warren Buffett

Asset Returns vs InvestorsI put off publishing this letter for about two weeks, as over the past month, stock market volatility has increased quite a bit. While we are not seeing the wild swings of 2011, we are seeing a significant reaction to the overdue realization that the enduring slow global growth I have talked about multiple times and the end of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve are both real. 

Buffett’s quote above is meant to convey a message that emotions should not be a part of our investing process. He goes onto discuss how volatility gives us opportunities to buy great companies at good prices.

With the uptick in volatility, I have not responded by fearfully selling assets. We actually were doing some selling between May and September when volatility was lower and most investors were complacent. Instead of being a seller the past two weeks, I have indeed been a buyer.

Continue Reading

 

Freedom to Unite and Invest in Tomorrow

UpWhen I was a kid I dreamed about being an astronaut, a baseball player, a rock star and the President. As I hit my teen years and I hadn’t done much musically, I dropped the Mick Jagger aspirations and focused on baseball. By senior year of high school I knew that baseball was fun, but that I wasn’t an elite player so I had to drop the Robin Yount dream too. 

When I got to college, I focused on having a good time and taking courses that might help me when I grew up. For awhile I thought I’d be a lawyer, but a great uncle gave me some guidance and I decided against that career path. I graduated from college with a degree in economics and a second in political science with a law certificate tossed in. That’s not what I dreamed about as a kid, but it has proven to be a good direction for me. I got there by taking one step at a time and just not stopping.

Continue Reading

 

The Great Retrenching Continues…

Total DebtIn September of 2008 I had coffee with a group of executives from local manufacturers, it was just after the financial crash had started. One company president in the group — a particularly political sort — asked me how long the economic slowdown would last? I said “until the middle of the next decade sometime.” He laughed at me.

Fast forward to today. What we know now is that the economy still has not recovered in real terms and that it will be a few more years until it does. The United States is just about in the middle of a demographic depression that can not be fixed with legislation or easy money. We must wait until household formation and spending by the very large millennial/ echo boom generation ramps up. Last year was the first year since 2008 that we saw an uptick in the birth rate, so that is a positive, however, it is only a baby step.

Continue Reading 

 

2014 Another Crossroads 

S&P 5002013 proved to be a profitable year for investors. The S&P 500 rose 29% and set new record highs. Global balanced indexes, more representative of most people’s portfolios, also did very well by returning about 20% despite a tough year in China which lost 9%.

The high return of the stock market had an expected effect on people. Many investors started to chase returns and look to be more aggressive after years of being risk averse. The result was that 2013 saw the most money from retail investors flow into stocks since 2000. I discussed this in a November article on MarketWatch titled “How Bad Will New Investors Get Hit.”   

Continue Reading

 

Volatility, Opportunity and the Next Crisis

Secular Bulls and BearsOver the past several years, I have discussed the monumental demographic changes that not only America is dealing with, but also that Europe, China and Japan are dealing with. The cumulative impact of national and personal debts, de-leveraging from the bubbles of the 2000s and the four largest economies in the world having aging populations has created global demand destruction that is not likely to end soon.  

Continue Reading